War and Silence in Bangladesh Bina D Costa

Question: Write an essay on War and Silence in Bangladesh? Answer: Introduction: The discussion highlights the journey of Bina DCosta, where she explores into the depth about nation building process, Political factors which were directly related to the issues of war kind and sexuality and gender and minority group marginalizing. DCosta here explains how the involvement of the state affected the gender identity construction. It also explained how powerfully handling women and their sexuality has been a main issue to the project of nation building. Bina DCosta has applied a significant feminist concept for the two main conflicts in which one was about the partition of the subcontinent of India around August, 1947 and the war for liberalization in Bangladesh during 1971. The study also offers proposition for identified historical injustice and crime during war, in reference to modern Bangladesh. The marginal Identity: According to historical evidence, the first partition resulted in bloodshed and around 300,000 Bengali female became the target of the army of Pakistan. They thought the continuous raping of women would be a part of ethnic cleansing. Bina DCosta laid a practical framework which mostly highlighted the unresolved abstract issues. The research work of DCosta demonstrated that many women who had been interrogated in this context were more comfortable to revert to female researchers from outside locations. During the research she encountered a big challenge which was related to feminist discourse to fieldwork. In reference to Birangona DCosta explained that those who were not agreeing to be interviewed were debarred from fetching water in their nearby communal tubewell. A birangona is someone who is a survivor and possesses the power to control her own destiny in context to her limitations. Where most theories and research about females were not represented in the studies there the actual incidences were not at all shared that happened during wars in South Asia. DCosta stated in her methodology that what she captured is not necessarily the truth, not only that in her methodology she also stated that varying women has different ideas about whom to consider victim and whom to consider as a survivor. More than a clear picture the research focused the abstractness and the lack of proper cooperation of women then how can the research come to a proper conclusion. DCosta study was more about compelled women who aimed to suppress their stories from the researchers. Conclusion: The sole purpose for raping those women was producing the pure breeds of Muslims who would carry offspring of loyal Pakistani and not the Indian or Hindu supporters. According to the analysis the strategic use of raping women had an intention to create Genocide. This instigated war between west and East Pakistan during 1971. So far there were no trace of detailed research on the use of forced impregnation and rape. The research did not follow an inquisitive nature of finding out the details, but it respected women who did not wish to share about the subject. This was more knowledge based and this knowledge is more about opinion and not the real impact.